Budget track from Cheltenham Models

Started by petercharlesfagg, April 30, 2013, 07:08:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

petercharlesfagg

Each can do but little, BUT if each did that little, ALL would be done!

Life is like a new sewer pipe, what you get out of it depends on what you put into it!

A day without laughter is a day wasted!

Newportnobby

Quote from: petercharlesfagg on April 30, 2013, 07:08:23 PM
Friends,

Anyone any experience of this budget flexible track?

http://www.cheltenhammodelcentre.com/shopexd.asp?id=3163&bc=no

Regards, Peter.

Ummm - in a word 'no'
There is no description of the manufacturer or what code it is :uneasy:

GrahamG

Hi Peter,
I bought some of this for my fiddle yard and although I've had no problems with its running qualities, I did have a problem using the standard Peco rail joiners. It seems that the bottom of the rail is fractionally wider than Peco track, so I had to file it narrower until the joiners fitted. On reflection I would probaly go for code 80 Streamline on future fiddle yards.
Graham

Trainfish

Quote from: Cheltenham Model Centre
Approx. 2ft5inch or 900mm. Stock 0

2' 5" = 737mm not that it matters as it appears they don't have any in stock anyway.
John

To see my layout "Longcroft" which is currently under construction, you'll have to click on the dead fish below

<*))))><


See my latest video (if I've updated the link)   >> here <<   >> or a random video here <<   >> even more random here <<

PLD

Assuming it is the Italian stuff...

It's OK but inferior to Peco. The sleeper base is a less flexible plastic than Peco use and the webbing is only gapped on one side rather than alternating as peco do. That means it only bends easily in one direction and also the chairs break off rather too easily if it is not treated carefully...

It is claimed to be a match for Peco code 80 and the rail height is very close, but the rail section is noticably wider and consequently as mentioned  above using the standard Peco rail joiners needs some careful adjustment...

Phil Hendry

We found that it was a touch higher too - perhaps 0.083" instead of 0.080" high.  It wasn't a success - we used a load of it in the fiddle yard of a layout at the club, and ended up relaying it all with Peco.

I am not a complete lunatic - there are pieces missing!

AJB

Perhaps, once again, you get what you pay for!

Please Support Us!
July Goal: £100.00
Due Date: Jul 31
Total Receipts: £43.45
Below Goal: £56.55
Site Currency: GBP
43% 
July Donations