Anyone else waiting for an eclipse ? / mad

Started by MalcolmInN, September 27, 2015, 11:31:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Trainfish

I just looked outside and the moon isn't even up there. Does that mean it has been eclipsed or am I barking up the wrong tree out there? Actually there's a link there to "the last time"...................

I'm going to bed
John

To see my layout "Longcroft" which is currently under construction, you'll have to click on the dead fish below

<*))))><


See my latest video (if I've updated the link)   >> here <<   >> or a random video here <<   >> even more random here <<

Trainfish

Quote from: railsquid on September 28, 2015, 01:16:14 AM
Quote from: Trainfish on September 28, 2015, 12:43:34 AM
I've been ordered to cover up after the last time. But that's a story for another day......................
That was the time people really did think the moon had fallen into Devizes?

Well, there definitely WAS a moon that night and it wasn't in the Crammer  :-[
John

To see my layout "Longcroft" which is currently under construction, you'll have to click on the dead fish below

<*))))><


See my latest video (if I've updated the link)   >> here <<   >> or a random video here <<   >> even more random here <<

MalcolmInN

Still a bit to go,
and I am thinking ( ! )
Fred's diagram shows not exactly a central pass, but he does not say for what lattitude ? So, considering that he is in North America and typically lat40 (give or take) will it be even more a bit less than a middle pass for us at 50+ looking a bit down on it ?

Wot am I on about y'all may ask, well this media hype about the moon turning red !
Not particularily so unless it passes (centrally) thro the middle of the deepest bit !
based on previous eclipses I predict that "copper coloured" will be a bit better description :)




MalcolmInN

20min ago begining to darken top left as moon goes into umbra :


MalcolmInN

Above two shots hand held 18x zoom on Panasonic FZ18
at f8 1/200 and f5.6 1/200

just realised that I loaned my tripod to daughter some time ago,
I'm not going to be able to get shots down in totality :( ! argh
unless I can find a convenient wall to prop my uncertain hand on !
oh woe

anyone still awake ?


MalcolmInN

Oh what a perfect sky for it,
even able to show swmbo the Andromeda Galaxy M31 eyeball with -  the moon in the sky at the same time !


MalcolmInN

Well, that was QI
but I must be mad, it is now 4:50am local
nitenight !


Bealman

Nite nite I mean good morning. Great moon pics!  :thumbsup:
Vision over visibility. Bono, U2.

Geoff

Totally missed the first eclipse but thanks for the photo  :thumbsup:
Geoff

D1042 Western Princess

Quote from: Trainfish on September 28, 2015, 12:18:21 AM

I've just got out of the shower. Do I have approval to wander around the garden in my bath robe to see it?

I was going to say they'd certainly see it if the bathrobe comes undone, but on a rethink decided such low grade comments were beneath me so I won't.  :D
If it's not a Diesel Hydraulic then it's not a real locomotive.

D1042 Western Princess

Quote from: MalcolmAL on September 28, 2015, 12:00:15 AM
Quote from: D1042 Western Princess on September 27, 2015, 11:47:44 PM
Being involved with 'minor party'
Good luck to those staying up.
Sharp intake of breath ! I fear we may need another topic to do justice to Jeremy and Nigel  :angel:

but to be fair - the facts of the 'super' moon and its orbit are true, just not the bit about it being noticable to yer average joe ( and i dont mean that in a superior manor, just a convenient economy of keyboard )
I have in my archives (for another thread / time ) a composite pic of the moon at perigee and apogee and the difference is notable,
but simply just not noticable to when - out there watching unaided eye -

I promised to keep off politics when I joined so couldn't possibly respond to your first part.
Re the second I was thinking of comments from reporters implying that the moon would 'look a lot larger than usual' and such like.
As others have commented, it will disappoint a lot of casual observers that it won't appear any different to them size wise than any other night.
If it's not a Diesel Hydraulic then it's not a real locomotive.

steve836

Quote from: MalcolmAL on September 28, 2015, 12:53:51 AM
Quote from: Trainfish on September 28, 2015, 12:43:34 AM
I've been ordered to cover up after the last time. But that's a story for another day......................
We boggle ! , ,  but we have another hour to go 'for anything else exciting happens so carry on , , , !

me - my neighbours are so far away they coldna' see nohow, especially when, in summer, the leaves are on the trees,
too much info,
te dum te dum,

it's still bright AND COLD out there !

If its that cold your neighbors won,t see anything anyway :D
KISS = Keep it simple stupid

MikeDunn

Quote from: MalcolmAL on September 27, 2015, 11:31:11 PM
Anyone else mad enough to be waiting up ?
Lemme see - nope ...  Work day today  :'(

Quote
PS dont believe all this media hype about a super-moon, the % difference will not be noticable to the unpracticed eye without a filar micrometer eyepiece.
People will have seen the Moon near the horizon looking big & gone "wow, they wos right !"  ::)  I'm always a little saddened & annoyed when the meedya harp on about how "rare" it is - cobblers !  A total eclipse visible from the UK - now that's rare !  A supermoon ?  The physics dictate one happens every 14 lunars ... although halfway through the period you can get 3 in a row (physics is like that, sometimes  ::)) although the one before & one after will new supermoons, and therefore not visible  :P

Bealman

Nowt's visible in Tasmania at the moment.... and that includes the top of the mountain behind Hobart.  :(
Vision over visibility. Bono, U2.

Please Support Us!
May Goal: £100.00
Due Date: May 31
Total Receipts: £12.34
Below Goal: £87.66
Site Currency: GBP
 12%
May Donations