Main Menu

Recent posts

#11
N Gauge Discussion / Re: 4-6-0 thread
Last post by trkilliman - Yesterday at 07:18:54 PM
I paid two deposits with D.J. for Kings.

Paying by credit card I had the deposits repaid in full. I know others were not so lucky in getting their money back, if they paid by a different way.

I think the most likely to release a King would be Farish.

Dapol have dropped their controversial cardan shaft. I imagine many will be keen to see/try their Mogul and Manor with the new mechanisms. (I wonder who was responsible for the cardan shaft at Dapol?) A Grange with their new mechanism could be next from them?

Sonic could surprise us with a King. I understand their owner once worked for Bachmann, and designed the latest incarnation of the Coronation/Duchess loco.

Any of them may/or may not be working on a King in the background.
#12
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Alternating bodies
Last post by Bob G - Yesterday at 06:25:41 PM
You dirty man. Wash your hands next time.
#13
N Gauge Discussion / Re: 4-6-0 thread
Last post by thebrighton - Yesterday at 06:22:58 PM
Quote from: Bigmac on <strong>Yesterday</strong> at 06:15:48 PMRe the C Class: Maybe there was a tie up between Bachman and the Bluebell, sponsorship perhaps, otherwise it was a strange choice for n gauge. Was it a good seller ?

Well they released a second run so I would say yes.
#14
N Gauge Discussion / Re: 4-6-0 thread
Last post by Bigmac - Yesterday at 06:15:48 PM
Quote from: martyn on <strong>Yesterday</strong> at 03:12:30 PMTo go back to @Dorsetmike OP; the SR has no 4-6-0s, which it relied on for much of its existence for  passenger, and a lesser extent, mixed traffic and goods services. And if the SECR C class was thought viable, why not an SR 4-6-0?

Don't forget that in rtr, with the demise of UM, the LNER only now has two models, the B17 and B1; the latter were only multiplied after WW2, and most were built by BR.

@Bigmac

Sorry, the humour went over my head....

Martyn

Re the C Class: Maybe there was a tie up between Bachman and the Bluebell, sponsorship perhaps, otherwise it was a strange choice for n gauge. Was it a good seller ?
#15
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Bachmann and Farish Winter...
Last post by Roy L S - Yesterday at 04:51:17 PM
Quote from: Railbank on <strong>Yesterday</strong> at 03:59:20 PMDitto cattle wagons destined for the bargains bin and a very long sales period.



Why do you say that? The Peco one has been around and selling for long enough and the Farish one is a decent model on the correct wheelbase chassis. Cattle wagons were a staple traffic on railways right into the 60s and they were also used for other things like beer in barrels too. There hasn't (as far as I am aware) been a production run of the Farish model for a while.
#16
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Bachmann and Farish Winter...
Last post by Railbank - Yesterday at 03:59:20 PM
Ditto cattle wagons destined for the bargains bin and a very long sales period.

I wouldn't be surprised if the HNRC 20's go the same way - they seem too niche just like the LUL set previously.
#17
N Gauge Discussion / Re: 4-6-0 thread
Last post by martyn - Yesterday at 03:12:30 PM
To go back to @Dorsetmike OP; the SR has no 4-6-0s, which it relied on for much of its existence for  passenger, and a lesser extent, mixed traffic and goods services. And if the SECR C class was thought viable, why not an SR 4-6-0?

Don't forget that in rtr, with the demise of UM, the LNER only now has two models, the B17 and B1; the latter were only multiplied after WW2, and most were built by BR.

@Bigmac

Sorry, the humour went over my head....

Martyn
#18
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Bachmann and Farish Winter...
Last post by montyburns56 - Yesterday at 02:38:09 PM
Quote from: Suffolk Rob on November 04, 2026, 12:43:11 PMLittle surprised to see another 2 150s, been a fair few farish DMUs in bargin bins for a while now.



It is funny how often they announce items that you just know are destined for the bargain bins and then they wonder why their warehouses are full of unsold stock.
#19
N Gauge Discussion / Re: 4-6-0 thread
Last post by Roy L S - Yesterday at 02:36:38 PM
Quote from: martyn on <strong>Yesterday</strong> at 02:17:55 PMSorry, but 2" difference in driving wheel diameter wasn't even important at 12" : 1'.

Tyre wear could mean that drivers could be up to three inches smaller than nominal diameter before replacement was needed; it varied from company to company, probably, but I'm not sure.

So you could have a King with worn tyres with smaller wheels then a newly tyred Castle.

The biggest noticeable differences between King and Castle were front bogie and main steam pipe layout.

I've nothing against a King, but they certainly never got to East Anglia  ;) . Though as has just been said, the LNER Pacifics and V2s are available, and they were basically ECML and associated loops or GCR (not A4s) for their working lives.

Martyn

The King has a larger boiler both in terms of diameter and length (over 1ft longer) and the firebox is also 1ft 6 ins longer than that of the Castle all of which for me gives it a greater "presence".
#20
N Gauge Discussion / Re: 4-6-0 thread
Last post by Bigmac - Yesterday at 02:30:16 PM
 "Sorry, but 2" difference in driving wheel diameter wasn't even important at 12" : 1'."


errm--i was being facetious  ;D
Please Support Us!
November Goal: £100.00
Due Date: Nov 30
Total Receipts: £10.00
Below Goal: £90.00
Site Currency: GBP
 10%
November Donations