Main Menu

Recent posts

#11
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Model Rail 16xx and J70 tr...
Last post by Adam1701D - Yesterday at 10:33:44 AM
I must admit a J70 would be quite appealing and a great boon to Thomas fans who would like something closer to scale.
#12
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Model Rail 16xx and J70 tr...
Last post by Roy L S - Yesterday at 10:09:57 AM
Quote from: Jollybob on Yesterday at 12:08:58 AMWe already know what the price is going to be, it's going to be ridiculously expensive. And it will be sold as a limited batch so people are going to pay for it regardless.
But if it is something that someone really, really wants then they will pay for it.

Rob.

If a limited batch then inevitably the cost would be higher, as the smaller the production volume the more unit cost for each one will be. "Ridiculously expensive" is subjective, the person commissioning the model would need to at the very least cover their costs as will everyone else in the supply chain, but ideally make a return.

To take the example of the NGS Hunslet (albeit I understand 4,500 were made across the liveries) nobody could ever say that £82 (to members only) is ridiculously expensive, for a model with DCC and "stay alive" on board it is an absolute bargain and easily worth the cost of membership on top without taking any other NGS benefits into consideration so it really does depend on the business model of the person or company supplying it.

Where I kind of agree is that someone will pay a premium for a model they really want, but the key is to find a product where enough people will do that, but also price isn't totally elastic, there will always be a point at which too many potential customers will pass.

Roy
#13
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Proses Nelevator equivalen...
Last post by Sharkey51 - Yesterday at 09:52:29 AM
Thank you for the kind observations, Bob.

If anything, the speed control is even better now that I've got Zimo sound decoders and a modicum of stay-alive, in all the locos. I found the ESU's were fine, but the Zimo's seem to be next level. It's also a testament to the quality of original Poole-era Farish loco mechanisms that they all run so well, some of them nearly half a century after manufacture.

Even though my son and I have only just commissioned Elevator Mk2, he is now working on Mk3, which promises to be an even better construction/design. He also has it in mind to make it "assemble yourself", which will be a good thing as I'm in Sydney and he's about to spend 2 years in New York! For those on the forum who are still thirsting for a N-elevator, our Mk3 might be able to fill a spot. Watch this space!
#14
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Proses Nelevator equivalen...
Last post by Bob Tidbury - Yesterday at 08:41:07 AM
Sharkey51
What a great layout you have even without your elevatotor the detail and the speed control is really good congratulations .
Bob
#15
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Proses Nelevator equivalen...
Last post by Will_J - Yesterday at 07:50:34 AM
These are a good Idea. I've built 3D printer kits in the past and it looks like these use the same types of hardware; stepper motors, lead screws, linear bearings on guide rails etc. there's no reason why they couldn't be built long enough for full HST or Pendo sets - it's just a matter of cost.

Though the components these are made out of really aren't expensive so anyone with the knowledge could DIY one however by the time you get it all together into a kit and put it out there for sale there are a lot of costs to recoup - so pretty much the same as anything else in the hobby really!

DCC-EX has stepper motor control functionality so that's the way I would go, then it could be controlled as just another layout accessory, any completely automated if I wanted.

I'm planning to make a horizontal traverser in this way one day, which is much the same really.

Will.
#16
General Discussion / Re: Happy thread
Last post by cmason - Yesterday at 12:38:15 AM
@Bealman  With an own goal? - hmmmm ... not sure why you are being quite so celebrartory ... obviously just the Toon being charitable with an early Christmas gift for the Southerners...  ;)   :beers: 
#17
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Model Rail 16xx and J70 tr...
Last post by Jollybob - Yesterday at 12:08:58 AM
We already know what the price is going to be, it's going to be ridiculously expensive. And it will be sold as a limited batch so people are going to pay for it regardless.
But if it is something that someone really, really wants then they will pay for it.

Rob.
#18
General Discussion / Re: The angry thread
Last post by Trainfish - December 14, 2025, 11:25:02 PM
After this week's shenanigans waiting 6 days for a tracked 48 parcel I'm hoping not to get angry with RM again this week. However, we are due to have fibre connected by Sky on Friday who have informed me today that the router has been posted out. Guess what they have used to post it. Yep, tracked 48 :censored:

You have been warned.
#19
General Discussion / Re: Railway Modeller
Last post by Bealman - December 14, 2025, 10:45:18 PM
Yeah, I do miss me good old RM. I prefer a real paper magazine, though I think they'll soon be history. Even all the newsagents are disappearing around here.
#20
General Discussion / Re: AI Image Manipulation
Last post by Bealman - December 14, 2025, 10:41:54 PM
Well it's obvious that it flies - there's no tyre tracks in the snow  ;)
Please Support Us!
December Goal: £120.00
Due Date: Dec 31
Total Receipts: £54.56
Below Goal: £65.44
Site Currency: GBP
45% 
December Donations