Recent posts #11
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by chrism - Today at 01:09:49 PMQuote from: GreenDiesel on Today at 12:40:04 PMQuote from: port perran on Today at 11:21:57 AMMy thoughts are that it isn't really relevant to an LMS themed layout and to me the double access steps on either side look a little strange. Looks very reminiscent of Southern Railway pre-fab concrete construction to me. #12
General Discussion / Re: what are you listening to ...Last post by port perran - Today at 01:04:36 PMQuote from: Newportnobby on Today at 12:48:20 PMEpic intro to this track but I very much suspect Rush are an acquired tasteHmmmm. I don't know much about Rush but was quite enjoying that until the vocals kicked in. As for intros, I've always rather liked this from The Stone Roses : #13
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by port perran - Today at 12:52:45 PMQuote from: GreenDiesel on Today at 12:40:04 PMI think that those concrete footbridges were used by the Southern quite extensively rather than other regions but someone might well prove me wrong.Quote from: port perran on Today at 11:21:57 AMMy thoughts are that it isn't really relevant to an LMS themed layout and to me the double access steps on either side look a little strange. Having said that, there was one at Trowbridge where I grew up (GWR/WR territory) but that was a footpath crossing rather than at the station. I imagine it's still there. #14
General Discussion / Re: what are you listening to ...Last post by Newportnobby - Today at 12:48:20 PMEpic intro to this track but I very much suspect Rush are an acquired taste
#15
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by GreenDiesel - Today at 12:40:04 PMQuote from: port perran on Today at 11:21:57 AMMy thoughts are that it isn't really relevant to an LMS themed layout and to me the double access steps on either side look a little strange. Thanks for your feedback! So if it's not LMS, what other region/railway would it be? My hunch is that it's a bit generic. #16
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by GreenDiesel - Today at 12:38:34 PMQuote from: port perran on Today at 11:21:57 AMMy thoughts are that it isn't really relevant to an LMS themed layout and to me the double access steps on either side look a little strange. Thanks! Yes, it was the double-access and its height (being slightly too tall) that were my main concerns. #17
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by port perran - Today at 11:21:57 AMMy thoughts are that it isn't really relevant to an LMS themed layout and to me the double access steps on either side look a little strange.
Double access is fairly common at very large and busy stations but not at smaller ones. #18
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by Bob G - Today at 09:40:23 AMI kit bashed this Ratio SR concrete footbridge to give alternative directions of ascent on each platform because the platforms are staggered. You would not provide an access route just to a platform end, as you have at the back of your model.
The Ratio kit also has open supports as mentioned above, and is an SR modular design. Helps my layout look southern. Bob G ![]() #19
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by ntpntpntp - Today at 09:22:20 AMKind of reminds me of the old Lone Star footbridge
![]() #20
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Feedback re N scale bridgeLast post by Moonglum - Today at 09:17:05 AMThe footbridge would also look better with intermediate landings on the four main staircases, with an equal number or risers to each side. The headroom (i.e. top of track to u/s of the main span) should be no less than 35mm to represent approximate standard headroom clearances. Say 40mm just in case!
Tim | Please Support Us!
January Goal:
£100.00 Due Date: Jan 31 Total Receipts: £100.56 Above Goal: £0.56 Site Currency: GBP 101% January Donations |
Page created in 0.011 seconds with 20 queries.