Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
General Discussion / Re: The angry thread
Last post by thebrighton - Today at 05:18:42 PM
Being a retired postie I still chat with a number of my old colleagues that are still gainfully employed by RM.

A sorry tale they tell. Nowhere near enough staff and far too many parcels to deliver. Managers telling them to do what they can whilst knowing it won't all be delivered and moral at rock bottom so many posties have given up and do the minimum they can get away with as no once cares.

A sad demise of a company I once enjoyed working for.
#2
General Discussion / Re: The angry thread
Last post by Newportnobby - Today at 03:27:52 PM
Quote from: mickeyflinn on Today at 01:36:35 PMRoyal Mail :censored:  :censored:  :censored:
15 days for a 1st class letter to travel less than 75 miles.
Nothing more to say!!!

Knowing RM, it's probably travelled at least 350 miles ::)
#3
General Discussion / Re: The angry thread
Last post by scottmitchell74 - Today at 02:43:51 PM
Quote from: Bealman on Today at 02:01:23 AMMy daughter got hit by a bloke on one of those stupid e bikes this morning. She's ok apparently but knocked around with a lot of bark off.

Bloody things ought to be banned. At the very least, much tighter regulation. As far as I see it, they are a motor vehicle and should be on the road. :veryangry:
Sorry to hear and absolutely! They should be off sidewalks and on roads as a vehicle. 
#4
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Modelling Network Rail - C...
Last post by F2Andy - Today at 02:34:12 PM
Quote from: GlenEglise on September 30, 2026, 09:46:49 PMThe model 3d print was by @F2Andy and may possibly still be available form him.
They are! Message me if interested.
#5
General Discussion / Re: The angry thread
Last post by mickeyflinn - Today at 01:36:35 PM
Royal Mail :censored:  :censored:  :censored:
15 days for a 1st class letter to travel less than 75 miles.
Nothing more to say!!!
#6
General Discussion / Re: what are you listening to ...
Last post by Newportnobby - Today at 01:24:01 PM
A selection of 'Broken Peach' who @Trainfish put me onto.
Here's one in 'plain clothes' i.e. not in costume. Some very good harmonies :thumbsup:


#7
N Gauge Discussion / Re: SPAM (Society for the Pres...
Last post by msr - Today at 01:22:24 PM
My understanding is that this model, without handrails, was produced from 1962 until 1964. I bought mine secondhand in 1970 from Beatties in Southgate and it was already in a play-worn condition. It has always run like a jet-propelled rocket!
#8
General Discussion / Re: The angry thread
Last post by Papyrus - Today at 10:40:30 AM
...and require licence and insurance...

Cheers,

Chris
#9
General Discussion / Re: The angry thread
Last post by Bealman - Today at 02:01:23 AM
My daughter got hit by a bloke on one of those stupid e bikes this morning. She's ok apparently but knocked around with a lot of bark off.

Bloody things ought to be banned. At the very least, much tighter regulation. As far as I see it, they are a motor vehicle and should be on the road. :veryangry:
#10
N Gauge Discussion / Re: SPAM (Society for the Pres...
Last post by ntpntpntp - Yesterday at 06:33:05 PM
Quote from: msr on Yesterday at 06:00:27 PMI'm pretty sure my Arnold Baldwin VO-1000 switcher in NH black and red livery belongs in SPAM. It is the early version, without handrails, Cat.No.0261





I think that goes right back to the Rapido 200 models of the mid 60s?  Not quite the very first as those didn't have the Rapido coupling we've come to know and love.
Please Support Us!
October Goal: £100.00
Due Date: Oct 31
Total Receipts: £12.34
Below Goal: £87.66
Site Currency: GBP
 12%
October Donations