Recent posts #1
General Discussion / Re: The angry threadLast post by Newportnobby - Today at 03:27:52 PMQuote from: mickeyflinn on Today at 01:36:35 PMRoyal Mail Knowing RM, it's probably travelled at least 350 miles #2
General Discussion / Re: The angry threadLast post by scottmitchell74 - Today at 02:43:51 PMQuote from: Bealman on Today at 02:01:23 AMMy daughter got hit by a bloke on one of those stupid e bikes this morning. She's ok apparently but knocked around with a lot of bark off.Sorry to hear and absolutely! They should be off sidewalks and on roads as a vehicle. #3
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Modelling Network Rail - C...Last post by F2Andy - Today at 02:34:12 PMQuote from: GlenEglise on September 30, 2026, 09:46:49 PMThe model 3d print was by @F2Andy and may possibly still be available form him.They are! Message me if interested. #4
General Discussion / Re: The angry threadLast post by mickeyflinn - Today at 01:36:35 PMRoyal Mail
15 days for a 1st class letter to travel less than 75 miles. Nothing more to say!!! #5
General Discussion / Re: what are you listening to ...Last post by Newportnobby - Today at 01:24:01 PMA selection of 'Broken Peach' who @Trainfish put me onto.
Here's one in 'plain clothes' i.e. not in costume. Some very good harmonies #6
N Gauge Discussion / Re: SPAM (Society for the Pres...Last post by msr - Today at 01:22:24 PMMy understanding is that this model, without handrails, was produced from 1962 until 1964. I bought mine secondhand in 1970 from Beatties in Southgate and it was already in a play-worn condition. It has always run like a jet-propelled rocket!
#7
General Discussion / Re: The angry threadLast post by Papyrus - Today at 10:40:30 AM...and require licence and insurance...
Cheers, Chris #8
General Discussion / Re: The angry threadLast post by Bealman - Today at 02:01:23 AMMy daughter got hit by a bloke on one of those stupid e bikes this morning. She's ok apparently but knocked around with a lot of bark off.
Bloody things ought to be banned. At the very least, much tighter regulation. As far as I see it, they are a motor vehicle and should be on the road. #9
N Gauge Discussion / Re: SPAM (Society for the Pres...Last post by ntpntpntp - Yesterday at 06:33:05 PMQuote from: msr on Yesterday at 06:00:27 PMI'm pretty sure my Arnold Baldwin VO-1000 switcher in NH black and red livery belongs in SPAM. It is the early version, without handrails, Cat.No.0261 I think that goes right back to the Rapido 200 models of the mid 60s? Not quite the very first as those didn't have the Rapido coupling we've come to know and love. #10
N Gauge Discussion / Re: SPAM (Society for the Pres...Last post by msr - Yesterday at 06:00:27 PMI'm pretty sure my Arnold Baldwin VO-1000 switcher in NH black and red livery belongs in SPAM. It is the early version, without handrails, Cat.No.0261
However, I am not sure about this Japanese C56. I understand it dates from 1982 but by Japanese standards this is still very early for N Gauge. The manufacturer was Nakamura Precision (Nakamura Seimitsu; Nakasei) who are better known for HO models. I wonder if this was one of a series, or planned series, judging from the card that was within the loco's box: This C56 in N (1:150) and has a considerable weight thanks to its metal body. It runs well by contemporary Farish standards but not a patch on the silky smooth Kato equivalent recently released (illustrated in the bottom photo). Here's the modern Kato equivalent; definitely not a SPAM member: | Please Support Us!
October Goal:
£100.00 Due Date: Oct 31 Total Receipts: £12.34 Below Goal: £87.66 Site Currency: GBP 12% October Donations |
Page created in 0.011 seconds with 20 queries.