Main Menu

Recent posts

#71
N Gauge Discussion / Re: New Graham Farish Class 37...
Last post by Will_J - August 05, 2026, 04:57:02 PM
Quote from: eddief83 on August 05, 2026, 04:32:16 PMI am still waiting for an intercity version of the 37/4's its the missing link for West Highland modellers

I'd like this too!

As for the ride height etc, looks exactly like previous production runs to my eye. It looks ok when running on a layout when it's well below eye level so I could live with it. But yes I can see why others were hoping it would be corrected on a future tooling.

I wonder who supplied the sound project? There are a few for the 37 and they vary in character quite a bit.
#72
N Gauge Discussion / Re: SPAM (Society for the Pres...
Last post by joe cassidy - August 05, 2026, 04:55:26 PM
Quote from: PLD link=msg=887215
6242 "City of Glasgow" was the only LMS Black release in the Poole era. (Ref 1811)
/quote]

Farish also did no. 6255 City of Hereford in LMS black livery during the Poole era.
#73
N Gauge Discussion / Re: New Graham Farish Class 37...
Last post by eddief83 - August 05, 2026, 04:32:16 PM
Quote from: jamespetts on August 05, 2026, 04:30:00 PMIt is good to see this - hopefully some 37/4s will come in time.

I am still waiting for an intercity version of the 37/4's its the missing link for West Highland modellers
#74
N Gauge Discussion / Re: New Graham Farish Class 37...
Last post by jamespetts - August 05, 2026, 04:30:00 PM
It is good to see this - hopefully some 37/4s will come in time.
#75
N Gauge Discussion / Re: SPAM (Society for the Pres...
Last post by Cols - August 05, 2026, 04:09:18 PM
I have just read (twice) through all of this thread today, and I am still a tad unclear as to when an N-Gauge model qualifies as "Ancient". I would venture that it was any model produced before Dapol turned out its first N-Gauge models and Graham Farish was bought by Bachmann...

I first dabbled in N-Gauge in 1971 - my first locomotives were the Farish 94XX 0-6-0PT, a Minitrix BR green Class 27 BO-BO, and the Peco Jubilee 4-6-0 (5713 "Renown") in lined black... Most definitely a Rule One collection! My N-Gauge collection expanded over the following few years and ran on a 9ft x 2ft 6in layout. However I was never really satisfied with the running qualities of British outline N locos - and was always disappointed with the quality of the models coming out of Poole (both in appearance and running), compared to what was available from the likes of Fleischmann, for example. After five or six years, I went over to 4mm EM scale...

Then, on a long weekend break in Cornwall, when sightseeing in Truro, I spotted Dapol's exquisite 14XX 0-4-2T auto-tank and and also their 45XX 2-6-2T small prairies (both versions) and promptly bought all three models - and I have never looked bacK! So that's why I would regard any pre-Dapol / acquisition of Farish by Bachmann model as being "Ancient". I've nothing against any "ancient" model - I am ancient (80 years old) and my layout (Trewenn) is very firmly analogue!!!

(I still have those two small prairie tanks - they run beautifully (and slowly!), though their haulage capacity is limited to three coaches or about ten goods wagons.)

Anyone else followed a similar path?
#76
N Gauge Discussion / Re: New Graham Farish Class 37...
Last post by bluedepot - August 05, 2026, 03:01:48 PM
it leaves the door open to revolution or rapido to make a correct height 37 maybe...

it's not the end of the world of course, but if it's really a band new tooling you'd expect it to be better than the previous 37s.

i think maybe they have used the old chassis and body dimensions as a starting point?  i suppose they want the old bodies to fit the newer chassis with speaker... who knows...

#77
N Gauge Discussion / Re: New Graham Farish Class 37...
Last post by EtchedPixels - August 05, 2026, 02:02:34 PM
Doesn't help that it looks like it's got a drainpipe glued to the end of each nose. If they can't make that detail fine they should have omitted it - it looks ludicrous.

Otherwise apart from the height still being screwed up it doesn't look too bad.
#78
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Bachmann Autumn 26 announc...
Last post by Carmont - August 05, 2026, 02:01:49 PM
I understand that the yellow triangle on the 24.5Ts was to enable easy identification between them and the lower capacity 21Ts.

Does anyone have a date in respect of when the triangle started to be applied?

#79
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Bachmann Autumn 26 announc...
Last post by EtchedPixels - August 05, 2026, 01:57:40 PM
Quote from: Suffolk Rob on August 05, 2026, 01:51:41 PMIt's all relative oo got one new retooling livery and a few reruns of rolling stock and some aren't half kicking off over on RMWEB.

I bet they are, 75 quid for a OO coach. Even more ludicrous than N prices.

But it's how things were in the old days - Hornby would have a yearly big reveal for one or two new items, nothing else but reliveries.
#80
N Gauge Discussion / Re: Bachmann Autumn 26 announc...
Last post by Suffolk Rob - August 05, 2026, 01:51:41 PM
Quote from: Newportnobby on August 05, 2026, 01:37:58 PMAll pretty thin considering just a month to TINGS. No doubt I'll get some of those 24½ tonne minerals. After all, I keep being told I haven't got the minerals ;)

There's always a chance of a new tooling announcement pre-TINGs but I'd accept less likely with 2 new toolings announced today. Maybe more 20 & 37 varieties?

It's all relative oo got one new retooling livery and a few reruns of rolling stock and some aren't half kicking off over on RMWEB.
Please Support Us!
August Goal: £220.00
Due Date: Aug 31
Total Receipts: £15.00
Below Goal: £205.00
Site Currency: GBP
 7%
August Donations