Quote from: newportnobby on January 11, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
Quote from: Sprintex on January 11, 2013, 02:22:58 PM
When you're using an 8 year old laptop with an ancient Celeron processor and less than 500MB of ram you don't tend to notice the forum going any slower than usual :D
Paul
Stop buying those HST worms and get a new laptop >:D :D
It's not the cost of a new laptop that's stopping me, it's the cost of the Dreamweaver software I'd need for Windows 7 or 8 as well so I can update my website :P
Paul
It's not the cost of a new laptop that's the problem, it's everything else you have to update and that's exactly why I haven't updated from Win XP, I'd need new versions of my video editing software, music editing software, midi editing software plus various other things the compatibility wizard says won't work on Vista/Win7 etc. I have max'd the memory and fitted a larger drive to my laptop but I'm really pushing it now.
Exactly, same here Caz :( Done all I can to this old laptop but it still struggles to cope. Have to turn off the Antivirus to watch videos or it's like very bad stop-motion animation! :goggleeyes:
Paul
Hi Caz, if you upgrade to a more powerful machine, you can always use a virtual XP server to run your old software. I haven't done this in Windows 7 with XP, but I have used this to run Windows98 software on an XP machine. No reason why it shouldn't work, it is Microsoft. :D HAve a look at http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtual-pc/ (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtual-pc/)
Malc
Thanks Malc, sounds a bit too complicated for me, I don't do bad for an oldie, but there are limits! :)
To be honest - don't touch MS's virtualisation ... use VMWare ! Far superior.
And it's not difficult ... especially if you move to a new (and larger) disk.
Hi Caz,
Another possibility if you are running out of upgrades to do might be to get a Solid State Drive (SSD) for your system drive. You don't need to get a large one, 64GB would do, as you can keep you current hard drive as as second hard disk (D:\). With your system files, and most often used program files on a SSD you should find load times drastically reduced, it should make your system much more responsive. You'll still be limited by the speed of your processor obviously.
I've not yet tried this myself and I'm not 100% certain of the benefits of putting one into a really old machine, but it might be worth investigating.
Mark
if you plan to upgrade a windows PC do it soon, much of the upcoming hardware will not run anything below windows 8 as lots of ancient compatibility stuff is on the way out and drivers will also get harder and harder to find for older windoze,
Or just run Linux :-)
Quote from: intraclast on January 12, 2013, 05:29:54 PM
Another possibility if you are running out of upgrades to do might be to get a Solid State Drive (SSD) for your system drive. You don't need to get a large one, 64GB would do, as you can keep you current hard drive as as second hard disk (D:\).
Been there, done that (and an E: drive too - must buy myself a new 2 or 3TB drive; running out of space again !!!). Works fine, I get a great boot time !!!
Just one thing - never
never run a defrag against SSD drives -
leave 'em alone !!!Mike
AFAIK Win7 has a compatability mode allowing you to run older software in its original form including XP (I stand to be corrected)
Win8 has I believe been designed essentially for the new range of touch screen tablets and smart phones, if you don't use one of those devices I can't see the point of it myself. :confused2:
I recently bought a new laptop with Windows 8 installed,
most of it seems to be irrelevant guff.
The Windows media player is another pain when I just want
to play a dvd or cd.
Quote from: EtchedPixels on January 12, 2013, 05:36:24 PM
... Or just run Linux :-)
EP has very good point here. If you have some older hardware and you want to extend the usable lifespan of it, stick Linux on it. A distribution like Ubuntu is usable out of the box and there is a pretty good help community for the things you get stuck on. Obviously you will not be able to run your Windows software, although quite a lot of programs will run under WINE (a windows emulator for Linux). Linux doesn't suffer from the sort of bloat that Windows does and an old bit of hardware will run much better on it. If you just need it for browsing the internet and word processing etc (on Libre office, a free alternative to Microsoft's) then you can get an extra few years out of your computer/laptop.
Mark
Quote from: intraclast on January 13, 2013, 08:09:29 PM
Quote from: EtchedPixels on January 12, 2013, 05:36:24 PM
... Or just run Linux :-)
EP has very good point here.
. . .
IF you have the knowhow to work such things! I'm not
completely computer-ignorant, I can usually sort most basic problems to do with settings, running new hardware, etc, but I wouldn't know where to start with running things to run other things on, or substituting parts of the Windows OS, and frankly I'd rather not tamper with such things for fear of permanently mucking something up! :goggleeyes:
Paul
Quote from: Sprintex on January 13, 2013, 08:43:21 PM
. . . IF you have the knowhow to work such things! I'm not completely computer-ignorant, I can usually sort most basic problems to do with settings, running new hardware, etc, but I wouldn't know where to start with running things to run other things on, or substituting parts of the Windows OS, and frankly I'd rather not tamper with such things for fear of permanently mucking something up! :goggleeyes:
Paul
Wouldn't worry. Chromebook is Linux, Android is Linux .. we'll get you in the end :D :D :D
Quote from: Sprintex on January 11, 2013, 04:31:35 PM
It's not the cost of a new laptop that's stopping me, it's the cost of the Dreamweaver software I'd need for Windows 7 or 8 as well so I can update my website :P
Hi Paul
The solution is ditch Dreamweaver! Plenty of (free) alternatives if you need a WYSIWYG html editor, or even better hand code (CSS and includes for headers/footers/menus etc makes adminstering sites very easy).
Cheers, Mike
Quote from: EtchedPixels on January 13, 2013, 10:04:58 PM
Wouldn't worry. Chromebook is Linux, Android is Linux .. we'll get you in the end :D :D :D
There you go again see . . . what on Earth is Chromebook and Android?? ???
Is Chromebook something to do with Google Chrome I keep getting pestered about?
Paul
Quote from: intraclast on January 12, 2013, 05:29:54 PM
Hi Caz,
Another possibility if you are running out of upgrades to do might be to get a Solid State Drive (SSD) for your system drive. You don't need to get a large one, 64GB would do, as you can keep you current hard drive as as second hard disk (D:\). With your system files, and most often used program files on a SSD you should find load times drastically reduced, it should make your system much more responsive. You'll still be limited by the speed of your processor obviously.
I've not yet tried this myself and I'm not 100% certain of the benefits of putting one into a really old machine, but it might be worth investigating.
Mark
I have been building desktop PC's for over 12 years and the biggest jump in performance in all that time has been the introduction of the SSD Drive.
I stuck one in an old laptop and added some memory and it was like a new machine.
I can recommend a decent supplier if anyone is interested.
Would an SSD drive work OK with the steam valves and brass gears that run my aging laptop?? :laugh:
Paul
It should do but you may have to oil it well :smiley-laughing:
Quote from: justintime on February 03, 2013, 12:24:11 PM
It should do but you may have to oil it well :smiley-laughing:
Not forgetting plenty of coal!
Dodger
All this talk of SSD's is interesting. The three latest machines we have purchased are tablet form PC's running full Windows 7 and Office 2010. They use an SSD instead of the more normal rotating magnetic hard disc. Imagine my dismay to read (after purchase) that they are subject to failure after about 10000 read/write operations ! Assuming normal office style use that's less than 3 years (10 bits of work only).
Yes they're quick, but paying extra for less than three years. What do the rest of you think ?
I work for the leading storage disk people, although SSDs are rear their life expectancy is about 1/3 of an old spinning style disk, but the seek rate is phenomenal!
I use Crucial and I have really hammered the two in my desktop over the last couple of years and they still show a good life expectancy. I am very happy to recommend Crucial SSD over conventional HDD but that's only my humble opinion. ;)
Quote from: BobB on February 03, 2013, 05:43:06 PM
Imagine my dismay to read (after purchase) that they are subject to failure after about 10000 read/write operations ! Assuming normal office style use that's less than 3 years (10 bits of work only).
Yes they're quick, but paying extra for less than three years. What do the rest of you think ?
You're paying for speed ... I have mine as my OS drive, and have it barred from defragging. That is guaranteed to bring the EOL forward ! My boot time dropped from around 90 seconds to 9 ...
They're good for what they are - but for home use, I'd never recommend one for data.
Quote from: BobB on February 03, 2013, 05:43:06 PM
All this talk of SSD's is interesting. The three latest machines we have purchased are tablet form PC's running full Windows 7 and Office 2010. They use an SSD instead of the more normal rotating magnetic hard disc. Imagine my dismay to read (after purchase) that they are subject to failure after about 10000 read/write operations ! Assuming normal office style use that's less than 3 years (10 bits of work only).
Yes they're quick, but paying extra for less than three years. What do the rest of you think ?
10,000 per block.
I'm using an SSD as main drive, no defragging no system page files on their and move the documents to secondary drive and it works a treat, if my current one fails im going to buy an Msata SSD that plugs directly onto the motherboard and is not much bigger than a SD memory card
Im a big fan of SSD, so depressing at work waiting a minute or so for the computer i my office to boot up,,,,
Sounds interesting these SSDs - not had one in a PC yet. My personal machine is a Lenovo X121e and it is great. Due to their FastBoot tech is loads up in about 10 seconds from a standard HD.
Paddy
Quote from: Fratton on February 04, 2013, 11:31:39 AM
I'm using an SSD as main drive, no defragging no system page files on their and move the documents to secondary drive and it works a treat, if my current one fails im going to buy an Msata SSD that plugs directly onto the motherboard and is not much bigger than a SD memory card
Im a big fan of SSD, so depressing at work waiting a minute or so for the computer i my office to boot up,,,,
Hope you take good backups :D
As with anything computer oriented good housekeeping and regular backups are a must with any type of hard drive. :thumbsup:
For those interested, just a quick technical note on the SSD write limits.
I haven't worked on SSDs per se, but I have designed several software products (such as cars' odometers and data loggers) that used the same kind of flash or EEPROM memory with basic hardware write counts varying between 10k and 1M. The key to practical designs is to spread out and dilute these writes so that the limit becomes (almost) irrelevant, or at least only cuts in after the end of the warranty period! Well, actually, the product's expected lifetime - typically 10 years or so. There have been many similar issues with past products - how many people have been bitten by a dead battery for an old PC's CMOS RAM, or the infamous Y2K bug or the forthcoming Unix/Linux Y2038 bug?
For file systems like SSDs, data will be written sequentially across different parts of the disk so that all parts of the disk have been written to once before any part gets written to a second time, and so on. It isn't quite that simple, but that is the ideal they aim for. Also, the 10k or 100k limit (or whatever) is what the chip manufacturer guarantees to the product manufacturer - the counts actually achieved in the real world can often be significantly higher.
Any respectable design engineer also tries to build in some sort of graceful failure handling when things start to degrade. For example, the flash/EEPROM memory in a car odometer has to be updated frequently so you don't lose too many (or any) miles/km if the battery gets disconnected. This would typically be done every one or two miles. However, when the mileage gets high enough (500,000+) and we start nearing the write limit, we can change to updating every 10 or 20 miles to preserve what capacity is left. All sorts of similar tricks are possible.
Anyway, in practical terms the SSD lifetime depends on how much data you write to it. The larger the drive, the more that data gets spread out, so the longer it lasts. Everything I've heard says that the lifetime is comparable to that of a conventional HDD. The best approach is to have two drives in your PC, and back things up regularly.
Thanks Martink
I feel a bit happier (I think !)
Quote from: swisstony on February 04, 2013, 12:45:20 PM
Quote from: Fratton on February 04, 2013, 11:31:39 AM
I'm using an SSD as main drive, no defragging no system page files on their and move the documents to secondary drive and it works a treat, if my current one fails im going to buy an Msata SSD that plugs directly onto the motherboard and is not much bigger than a SD memory card
Im a big fan of SSD, so depressing at work waiting a minute or so for the computer i my office to boot up,,,,
Hope you take good backups :D
my main drive is backed up to my tertiary drive every so often so if the SSD does happen to fail i should be able to retore a backup,